Copenhagen, and beyond
This editorial gives the New York Times’ assessment of Copenhagen. On the whole, they’re upbeat, seeing benefit in renewed US leadership and China’s emergence as
Abby Luby December 21, 2009
This editorial gives the New York Times’ assessment of Copenhagen. On the whole, they’re upbeat, seeing benefit in renewed US leadership and China’s emergence as
Here’s UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s assessment of the Copenhagen conference, as reported in the New York Times. His main point: Follow the money. Kyoto,
Secretary of State Clinton’s OpEd piece in today’s New York Times lets us reflect how far we have come toward a national commitment to limit
Stewart Brand, writing in the New York Times, dissects those warning of or scoffing at climate change. He distinguishes alarmists and skeptics, denialists and calamatists.
This report from Copenhagen in the New York Times analyzes delegates’ efforts to circulate unofficial treaty drafts. They represent 3 types of countries: the developed
Wonder of wonders, Paul Krugman of the New York Times is optimistic about Copenhagen. What’s more, he calls cutting greenhouse gases (GHGs) both affordable and
I’m glad someone at the New York Times has a good sense of humor about the potentially disastrous warming of Earth’s climate and the impending
Ex-Vice President Cheney believed in the one percent solution — aggressively responding to low-probability, high-impact events such as terrorist attacks as if they were certainties.
This New York Times editorial on the EPA’s endangerment finding for greenhouse gas emissions focuses on the rulilng’s domestic implications. The House has passed legislation
The New York Times reports that New York Mayor Bloomberg has shelved part of his effort to improve the energy efficiency of buildings in New
To this editorial from the New York Times, we here at ClimateYou.org simply say, “Amen.” The Brits (the theft occurred in the UK) would put
The latest flap, over emails stolen from climate scientists at East Anglia University in the UK, is just a flap. Some scientists may be embarrassed,
