HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

How My Academic Major Relates to Climate Change By City Tech Blogger Mark Stewart

When I was researched the prompt, I learned that my major (Software development) does serve as both a benefit and hindrance to climate change. When I researched climate change, I discovered major factors such as emission of greenhouse gases and lack of recycling to be the root of this problem. Despite the creation of software that runs power plants, the emission of greenhouse gases are not directly released from the software created in power plants. In my opinion, the sum of the parts has contributed to the effects of climate change on our planet.

As CO2 emissions have gradually increased, society must brainstorm ways to reverse the effects of climate change. Most researchers need some software development and equipment to solve these problems which is why my major serves importance. Since my major is in the S.T.E.M field, software developers create tools or software to determine the rate of change or preventatives to inform and curve change. In the article Renewable Energy Technologies: Panacea for World Energy Security and Climate Change?,  humans use nonrenewable sources of energy such as coal and fossil fuel as a major power source. Additionally, the usage of fossil fuel can result in coral bleaching  from increased  CO2 levels in the ocean as well as raising the atmospheric temperature of the Earth.  Personally, I believe we need to look at alternative sources of power, however, we shouldn’t fully eliminate fossil fuels as an energy source. I understand that it is difficult to transition to different energy sources similar to a person changing their daily habits, but it is necessary to preserve our planet.

Big tech companies and distributors can develop habits whether through R&D, or leaving waste that pollutes the Earth and has a major long- term effect. However, companies such as Amazon, Best Buy, Walmart are making strides in keeping emission levels low and progressing  with waste management from inventory and recycling from customers. In 2020, Best Buy’s ESG report discovered that there was 61% less carbon dioxide emission in their store. Their targeted goal was to have 75%  less carbon dioxide emission by 2030 which makes them ahead of their goal. Additionally, in the same report, water scarcity was recognized which made Best Buy want to  reduce the water use by 31% compared to 2019.  However, there are other factors that have been recognized as the cause of water scarcity at Best Buy such as the recent Covid-19 pandemic. The final big company distributor I looked at was Walmart. According to Walmart’s ESG report, their data shows that they are slowly reaching their goal of zero carbon dioxide emission.

In conclusion, if you help S.T.E.M majors in any form, you will leave an impact on the environment. We need to look for alternative fuel sources that can sustain nations and leave little impact on our environment. I believe that the major tech companies have been truthful to their goals and have been making strides in beating or completing the goal.


Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


More Posts Like This


OUR TAKE: Wildfire Update 2022 by ClimateYou Senior Editor Abby Luby

At any given moment thick, rolling smoke plumes covering several thousand acres are spewed out by raging wild fires burning all over the world. From Asia to Africa, Europe to North and South America, these extreme fires are exacerbated  by heat waves and droughts, the perilous extreme weather


The Silencing of Science by M.Annenberg, ClimateYou Guest Contributor

(Editor’s Note:  This essay is excerpted from Artist/Writer M.Annenberg’s  artist talk about the melting glaciers of the Hindu Kush) American democracy is skating on thin ice, when the potential loss of drinking water for one billion people, because of melting glaciers, is not considered news in the American

Take action in the fight against climate change