HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

Coal is Dying, and So Are We

Coal is a dead man walking, but it’s taking too long to die. As the dirtiest of fossil fuels, coal is one of the main reasons why the climate is in crisis. The CO2 it emits is a major cause of global heating, and the carbon particulates from the combustion of coal contribute to the eight million deaths globally each year from air pollution. 

Growing universal awareness that the climate is in crisis has increased pressure on the coal industry, the banks which finance it and the insurance companies that insure it. All have begun reacting to that pressure, setting policies to limit their risk exposure. Coal is also under pressure economically, as natural gas and both wind and solar now beat coal on price. 

The industry should be dead, but new plants continue to be planned, financed, and approved. Plants built today will speed emissions and pollutants for 30 or 40 years. Yet by that time the world must be close to net-zero emissions to avoid the most catastrophic consequences of a climate gone hostile. 

The coal industry knows it is ailing, but it doesn’t yet accept that its decline is irreversible, that its case is terminal. The financial sector has set policies to curb it, but loopholes render them ineffective. Governments are unwilling or unable to disrupt an established industry that employs thousands. Despite the best efforts of climate activists such as Greta Thunberg, political will is sorely lacking. Even stern warnings from the Secretary General of the United Nations, Antonio Guterres, have had little effect. 

Market forces are working, finance is starting to squeeze, and public disapprobation is tarnishing the industry’s image, yet none of these forces is acting quickly or forcefully enough. The climate crisis won’t wait. Coal needs a mercy killer, an executioner, a coup de grace. The world needs coal to die for humanity to live. Soon. 

The next and last chance for a coal-free world in time to avoid an uninhabitable planet is at the upcoming COP27 this November at a location still to be decided. This UN Climate Summit, six years after the Paris Accord, is when member nations are required to commit to greater efforts to keep global warming to tolerable limits. With the reengagement of the United States under the new Biden administration, the sputtering hope that the nearly 200 nations of the world can agree not to commit collective suicide gets an infusion of new hope. 

Will the leadership, the example, and the financial and political clout of the US be enough to overcome the inertia and sclerosis of that international body, the venality, local focus, and self-interest of politicians everywhere, and humanity’s innate propensity to discount possible future rewards in favor of either immediate gains or cost-avoidance now? 

Frankly, the prospects of Biden and Kerry rallying the world’s leaders at COP26 to commit to ending coal within the timeframe needed to avoid calamity are quite slim. Coal will continue to die a slow death, just like the human race. Greta has good reason to be outraged, and you should be too.

image: https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/the-sound-and-the-fury/news/the-coal-conundrum-2003689

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

One Response

  1. Agree, it’s important to keep the pressure on coal up. But surely, part of the persistent problem is those thousands of workers. What jobs are they going to be capable of, be able to find and have some long-term prospects of keeping? Will electric cars be made where coal plants used to be? What will Society’s adjustment to climate change really involve? Lockdown gave everyone some idea of how to slow down, live a little ‘lighter’ on the planet. But will that be enough for a New Normal? Will Hydrogen be developed soon enough? And What about supply chain shipping and the pernicious effects of mining rare earths and elements for computers?? It’s good they’re having a Summit!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on email

More Posts Like This

CONSEQUENCES

OUR TAKE: Heat Projections Higher in Recent Climate Models

Global climate models have been used by climate scientists since the 1970s. They have been refined over the years as more data have accumulated and computers have become faster and more powerful. Yet, even the relatively simple models from the 1970s have proved to be quite accurate at

OUR TAKE

OUR TAKE: Joe Manchin & Ecocide

Damn Joe Manchin. We’re toast, burnt toast, as a nation and a species. Manchin is guilty of killing American democracy — a woefully inadequate social welfare Reconciliation bill guarantees Trump 2024,  ecocide — a token American response to the climate crisis guarantees the failure of the UN climate

CONSEQUENCES

OUR TAKE: Unintended Consequences! Bushfire Smoke Prompts Plankton Bloom

Who in Australia would have guessed the 2019-20 bushfires would trigger a huge, continent-sized phytoplankton bloom in the Southern Ocean?  Deadly to animals, out of season, unprecedented in two decades of satellite records, this anachronistic event was tracked by biological oceanographers of the University of Tasmania, with results

Take action in the fight against climate change