HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

Bernie and Greta ARE Saving the Climate by ClimateYou Senior Editor George Ropes

An article in Forbes by Michael Shellenberger, who writes on energy and the environment, reveals his antipathy to climate change activists and a biased sense of the crisis. He attacks Bernie Sanders, Greta Thunberg, and the Extinction Revolution as alarmists, and disparages their calls to close all natural gas and nuclear plants. He cites selected statistics to argue that adopting those measures would make the climate crisis worse, not better. He’s wrong.

Natural gas, long touted as a lower emission “bridge” fuel between coal and zero-carbon renewables, is now considered to be even worse than coal, given the large amounts of methane (86 to 105 times more heat-trapping than CO2) vented in its production. Nuclear’s widely perceived threat of an accident is rare but real — witness Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi. Moreover, it has yet to solve how and where to store its radioactive waste for thousands of years. Besides, nuclear doesn’t come close to competing economically with renewables on a total cost basis. As the permits for nuclear plants to operate expire, they should close.

https://elpais.com/sociedad/2019/12/10/actualidad/1576011896_293446.html

Sanders and Thunberg are right about the climate crisis. It is an existential threat to life as we’ve known it. Resolving it entails reducing carbon emissions as far and as fast as possible, rapidly building out low cost – low carbon energy sources, developing and deploying means to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, and restoring the environment to sustainability. Closing natural gas and nuclear plants are reasonable steps toward controlling climate change. The world needs climate activists to overcome the skeptics and denialists. Go, Bernie. Go, Greta.

 

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on email

More Posts Like This

CONSEQUENCES

OurTake: COP26 — the Most Important UN Climate Summit Since COP21

COP26 is the most important UN climate summit since COP21 in 2015 when the Paris Agreement was signed. At that meeting, representatives from 195 member nations (called Parties; COP stands for Conference of the Parties) made Unilaterally Determined Commitments (UDCs) to lower their carbon emissions, the invisible gases

OUR TAKE

Our Take: An Empty-handed Biden Will Bereave us all

A piece in The Guardian titled “Is Joe Biden about to show up at COP26 empty-handed?”, by climate activist and author Kate Aronoff, argues persuasively that President Joe Biden has the executive powers necessary to set the US on a course to replace climate-heating fossil fuels with ones that

OUR TAKE

OUR TAKE: The Four Tasks

No matter what happens at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Conference of the Parties in Glasgow, Scotland next month, now is the time for all actors besides the governments of the world —individuals, universities and research labs, corporations, faith-based organizations, and civil society—to examine their

Take action in the fight against climate change