Just Released! Order “Waking Up to Climate Change” by George Ropes, and receive 25% Discount. Learn More

Close this search box.
Close this search box.

HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

How Realistic Are Bernie Sanders’ Climate Plans? by ClimateYou Senior Editor George Ropes

Fareed Zakaria, a regular commentator for CNN, Time and the Washington Post,  critiques Bernie Sanders’ climate plans as magic thinking. Granted, they are flawed, but not by much. Sanders wants to stop both gas and nuclear by 2030, a very ambitious goal. Zakaria scoffs at it as unrealistic. But is it?

The U.S. has cut its emissions in the last decade, mostly by replacing coal-fired energy plants by Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) ones. Yet there are still relatively few gas plants operating, although many are under development. LNG plants are destined to become uneconomical within a few years, as renewable sources continue to get cheaper and gas prices rise. Therefore Sanders need not close operating gas plants; it will suffice to put a hold on all new gas plants, of which there are many in the design and permitting stages. Most nuclear fission plants are nearing the end of their permitted operation; they’ll be closed within a few years. It would be enough for Sanders to call a halt to any new fission plants, if there are any wending their way through the long approval process. There’s an opportunity cost to building both those types of plants; the money to build them would be better spent on wind, solar, hydro, and on battery research, which Zakaria says is necessary. Both gas and nuclear are uneconomic in most places today. Nuclear plants are hugely expensive on a lifetime cost basis; gas plants are likewise uncompetitive if the environmental costs of fracking and the global heating that the CO2 they emit are reasonably costed. If new gas plants are built, they will be uneconomical long before their 30-40 year life span is over. They’ll be forced into bankruptcy just like coal plants these days. LNG is cheap now, but the sun and the wind will always be free. The lifetime costs of energy from wind, solar, and batteries will continue their sharp decline.

It may take us more than a decade to clean up our act, but if Sanders were to set 2035 or 2040 as his target for net-zero emissions from energy, that goal ought to be achievable in the context of a concerted national effort to ensure a hospitable climate for all Americans.

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.


More Posts Like This


ClimateYou Contributor & Key Supporter Alice Turnbull (1942-2023)

The passing of one of our contributors and most ardent supporters, Alice Turnbull, is a great loss not only to the ClimateYou Alliance but to her community in Port Melbourne, Australia, where she worked tirelessly to revive community parks with eco-friendly indigenous plantings. Alice was born in Scarsdale,


Art Inspired by Climate Change Data

Last week about 20 students stood next to small, blank canvases placed on tables. They were about to pour paint of various colors onto the canvases as part of a unique approach to understanding climate change. The students were in their weekly Natural Disasters class taught by Professor


When Art & Science Collide

What happens when artistic creative energies are inspired by raw, scientific data? Experimenting with this very idea in 2020, at the height of the COVID pandemic, the Climate Impacts Groups at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies started the “Science & Art Initiative,” seeking to challenge scientists