Just Released! Order “Waking Up to Climate Change” by George Ropes, and receive 25% Discount. Learn More

HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

Americans Need to Drive Less by ClimateYou Senior Editor George Ropes

This article by Michael Hobbes entitled “Democrats’ Baffling Blind Spot On Cars” posted on Huffington Post chastises Democrats for their  failure to address America’s biggest source of carbon emissions: driving automobiles. Hobbes calls the failure a blind spot, but it’s more like a third rail that all politicians, Republicans as well as Democrats, are loath to touch. Telling Americans they have to drive less is not a vote-getter. In most places, people have no viable alternative. Disinvestment in public transit for decades has left that option so unattractive or unavailable as to be moot.

For the most part, Hobbes does a good job laying out the dimensions of the problem, and assessing the pros and cons of adopting (or merely proposing) the various alternative ways to cut US transportation emissions significantly. Bernie Sanders’ Cash for Clunkers proposal gets short shrift as a very expensive way to make far too slow an impact on emissions, given that only 6% of Americans buy a new car each year. No Democrat has endorsed the type of restrictions on cars in urban areas that various European cities have implemented over initial opposition that quickly dissipates. Nor has a Democrat spoken out against Trump’s attacks on Obama’s CAFE emission standards, an especially egregious failure given Americans’ propensity for gas-guzzling SUVs.  Nor has there been any Democratic defense of California’s special status to set its own emission standards, which automakers initially supported but are caving under Administration pressure to end.

Simply put, Americans need to drive less, which may impinge on where they live. There is a nascent movement to return to the denser living of the cities from the sprawling suburbs, but for most people it’s a hard sell, given the perceived levels of urban crime and the actual quality of most urban schools. Hobbes doesn’t discuss decentralizing workplaces to reduce commuting time, nor high tech virtual conference software that would enable more people to work from home. Still, Hobbes has done the country — and the planet — a great service by highlighting the transportation emissions issue and politicians’ reluctance to address it. It’s telling that he never once mentions Republicans.

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.


More Posts Like This


My Take on Climate Change

Imagine it’s Christmas time and there’s no snow outside. In fact, it’s late December and the weather has mostly been warm for a long while since Halloween. The temperature for the most part has been remaining in the 30’s and sometimes early 40’s. Outside, it still looks like


Youth Activists Triumph in Groundbreaking Climate Trial

A landmark legal decision has overwhelmingly justified every human being’s right to a healthy environment. The huge victory by young climate activists in Montana is a win for young people all over the world whose future will undeniably be shaped by the effects of climate change. The case,


Losing our Coveted Trees to Floods

In the great aftermath of major flooding last week here in the Hudson Valley 30 miles north of New York City, towns and villages are recovering from torrential rains that dumped six to seven inches in an already saturated region. Roads dissolved under water. Streams, lakes and rivers