HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

Climate Change Dilemma Denied by City Tech Blogger Jonathan Chen

Understanding the mode in which climate change is harming the earth is not enough to stop the damage, especially with current infrastructure and demands. Slowing global warming is not as simple as stopping the processes that cause carbon emissions (i.e. power generation). While this would probably lower global temperatures, there is a social cost in doing so. Accepting that climate change is anthropogenic would mean that there must be some overhaul in society and industry which currently might not be feasible. Proper implementation of climate science-based policies is necessary to achieve global temperature goals and to have society wean off carbon-intensive energy.

One of the largest drivers of climate science denial is politics, according to John Cook in his article “Countering Climate Science Denial and Communicating Scientific Consensus”. Cook cites another study (by Tranter & Booth, 2015) that shows people across countries with conservative affiliations are consistently more skeptical of climate science. However, their contention is with its implementation. Conservative values seem to align with liberty, small government, and less government regulation. Cook cites another experiment that sought to show a causal link between cultural values and climate change mitigation. Politically conservative people were presented with possible mitigation strategies for climate change which included government regulation like carbon taxing or increasing use of nuclear energy. The nuclear energy option had a wider acceptance and had a positive effect on climate science reception whereas the regulation option reduced acceptance of climate science. It can be assumed, then, that substituting nuclear energy with even cleaner energy like solar or wind will be accepted by such climate science detractors as well, provided. An approach with less over-bearing government intervention would seem to be met with less resistance.

A common measure against emissions is the carbon tax, which is levying an extra cost on the consumption of hydrocarbon fuels. Usually, it is the average consumer that suffers the most from such taxes, especially those from rural communities.  Businesses reliant on fossil fuels will offset this cost onto the end-user by increasing the prices of goods and services, or offset this cost on their labor force via layoffs or decreased wages. According to a study by Marisa Beck et al., it shows that carbon taxes do disproportionately affect rural denizens not only because of the lack of public transportation but because of the reliance of fossil fuels for industry (the exact goal of their study was to show that some specific compensation for rural citizens of British Columbia was excessive, but that is irrelevant). It is assumed that the increased costs for carbon-emitting fuel will incentivize investment in alternative energy, but for those who are lower income or working class, this might be difficult to do. This is the catalyst that sparked the “yellow vests’” protests against carbon taxing without adequate cost-mitigation despite their worsening living conditions. This might be an example of a climate-science policy incorrectly implemented.



Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


More Posts Like This


SCOTUS Poised to Handcuff the EPA

In the wake of reactionary rulings by the Supreme Court that seized a woman’s right to abortion after the Justices had unleashed potentially lethal freedoms to gun owners, one can only shudder at the prospect of the court’s upcoming decision on West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).


How We Help to Slow, Stop or Solve Climate Change by a City Tech Blogger

If everyone could stop in a minute to acknowledge the harms we are causing on our planet, what would earth look like in the next 10 years or is it too late?  To quote George Bernard Shaw: “Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their


My take on Climate Change By A City Tech Blogger

  In the recent decade, I personally observed that temperatures started to get warmer and the winter season isn’t as cold as it once was. There have usual changes in temperature such as temperatures normally near zero degrees in the wintertime being in the twenties and thirties. In

Take action in the fight against climate change