Just Released! Order “Waking Up to Climate Change” by George Ropes, and receive 25% Discount. Learn More

HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

Climate Change Dilemma Denied by City Tech Blogger Jonathan Chen

Understanding the mode in which climate change is harming the earth is not enough to stop the damage, especially with current infrastructure and demands. Slowing global warming is not as simple as stopping the processes that cause carbon emissions (i.e. power generation). While this would probably lower global temperatures, there is a social cost in doing so. Accepting that climate change is anthropogenic would mean that there must be some overhaul in society and industry which currently might not be feasible. Proper implementation of climate science-based policies is necessary to achieve global temperature goals and to have society wean off carbon-intensive energy.

One of the largest drivers of climate science denial is politics, according to John Cook in his article “Countering Climate Science Denial and Communicating Scientific Consensus”. Cook cites another study (by Tranter & Booth, 2015) that shows people across countries with conservative affiliations are consistently more skeptical of climate science. However, their contention is with its implementation. Conservative values seem to align with liberty, small government, and less government regulation. Cook cites another experiment that sought to show a causal link between cultural values and climate change mitigation. Politically conservative people were presented with possible mitigation strategies for climate change which included government regulation like carbon taxing or increasing use of nuclear energy. The nuclear energy option had a wider acceptance and had a positive effect on climate science reception whereas the regulation option reduced acceptance of climate science. It can be assumed, then, that substituting nuclear energy with even cleaner energy like solar or wind will be accepted by such climate science detractors as well, provided. An approach with less over-bearing government intervention would seem to be met with less resistance.

A common measure against emissions is the carbon tax, which is levying an extra cost on the consumption of hydrocarbon fuels. Usually, it is the average consumer that suffers the most from such taxes, especially those from rural communities.  Businesses reliant on fossil fuels will offset this cost onto the end-user by increasing the prices of goods and services, or offset this cost on their labor force via layoffs or decreased wages. According to a study by Marisa Beck et al., it shows that carbon taxes do disproportionately affect rural denizens not only because of the lack of public transportation but because of the reliance of fossil fuels for industry (the exact goal of their study was to show that some specific compensation for rural citizens of British Columbia was excessive, but that is irrelevant). It is assumed that the increased costs for carbon-emitting fuel will incentivize investment in alternative energy, but for those who are lower income or working class, this might be difficult to do. This is the catalyst that sparked the “yellow vests’” protests against carbon taxing without adequate cost-mitigation despite their worsening living conditions. This might be an example of a climate-science policy incorrectly implemented.



Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.


More Posts Like This


My Take on Climate Change

According to information given on the website Climate.org, there are a number of statistics which are indicative of the current climate condition: For example, carbon dioxide in the Atmosphere — 414 (Carbon Dioxide…).  According to the Climate Portal of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, “Atmospheric CO2 levels of


My Take on Climate Change

Climate Change is largely discussed in today’s era, with countries doing everything they can to stop the increase of climate change, whether that’s using less plastic, reducing carbon emissions or resorting to solar energy. Despite everything that’s happening to prevent catastrophic events and aftermath in the future, climate


Climate Change From My Eyes

Over the years we have heard the term climate change being used in so many different ways. We hear what climate change has caused or things we can do to prevent it. But we never get the actual definition of what climate change is or where the term