Just Released! Order “Waking Up to Climate Change” by George Ropes, and receive 25% Discount. Learn More

Close this search box.
Close this search box.

HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

OUR TAKE: Geoengineering is Not the Answer to Climate Change

Questions about the efficacy of geoengineering were the focus of a recent article on Huffington Post,  entitled “The Dangerous Belief That Extreme Technology Will Fix Climate Change.” Our take here at ClimateYou is that Geoengineering is not the answer to climate change. Thinking that a technological fix will stop global climate warming is a fantasy. Technology does not and cannot address the underlying causes of climate change: capitalism, civilization, and the notion of progress. Long-term sustainability of the Earth as a viable habitat for humans and other life forms depends on responsible stewardship of the resources of the Earth. We cannot keep depleting those resources indefinitely. They are vast, but not inexhaustible. We cannot only consume; we must also replenish. We cannot forever pollute the air, land, and ocean. The Earth’s biosystem is complex, and has the ability to regenerate some of its resources. We can help or hinder that capacity. Human life was once characterized as “poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” Yet humans have, over the centuries, improved their lot. While many still live in poverty, unsure of their next meal, more and more humans, however, have achieved living conditions with at least minimal levels of food security, clothing, and shelter from the elements. And many more live lives of comfort, security, and opportunity undreamed of by our ancestors. Can such munificence be maintained, and expanded to include all of humanity without causing a collapse in the carrying capacity of the Earth? Climate scientists say yes, if we stop burning fossil fuels which spews into the atmosphere billions of tons of greenhouse gases that trap heat and cause global temperatures to rise. The sun provides much more energy than we need to maintain our current or any anticipated lifestyles; we don’t need carbon-based energy. Effecting an energy transition will not be easy; the fossil fuel industry is large, powerful, and pervasive. Curbing its power means challenging some of the basic tenets of capitalism, exerting uncommon amounts of political will, and instilling a new ethos of sustainability in all of humanity. By tomorrow or the day after — we don’t have much time before the bill for our profligate overspending of the Earth’s vast but ultimately limited resources comes due with increasingly intolerable pollution, droughts, heatwaves, floods, storms, famines, mass migrations, and political unrest. That’s what will befall us if we don’t act decisively now to curb carbon emissions. Geoengineering alone won’t save us, but a combination of politics, economics, and sociology, together with appropriate technology can, and must.

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

2 Responses

  1. I cannot agree more with the profound views put forward by Mr. George Ropes. The anthropogenic phase of humanity on Climate Change leaves so much to be desired in this world. Even moderation of fossil fuel contributes to Greenhouse gases and has proved hard to come by. Based on our economic values, the mean global temperature is expected to further increase. This heat increasing phenomenon is likely to have a negative effect on planet Earth and all its inhabitants.
    Even though the sun provides most of the energy needed by the earth, a lower albedo would be present due to less energy being reflected to space. Hurricane season is likely to be extended too. Agriculture can be negatively impacted (Global Warming impacting GDP).
    These possible horrendous cascading effects should be avoided immediately.
    Although the most efficient Greenhouse gas is water vapor, the fact that humanity has control over carbon dioxide, it should become one of mankind’s greatest concern for eradication. “Technology fixes” mainly address the symptoms of situations. Hence, I firmly believe that humans should be here for a good time; not just a long time. However, we must muster the discipline necessary to create sustainable societies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.


More Posts Like This


The Intersection of Computer Engineering & Climate Change: Building a Sustainable Future

In the face of mounting environmental challenges, the role of technology, particularly computer engineering, has emerged as a crucial factor in addressing climate change. This essay explores how computer engineering intersects with climate change and how individuals can leverage their careers to make a positive impact on the


Climate Rules, Laws Mitigate Droughts & Heatwaves

Climate exchange regulation serves as an essential device in mitigating the detrimental outcomes of world warming, in particular concerning phenomena like droughts and heatwaves. The policies handed via Congress in August 2022 signify a pivotal step in the direction of addressing weather trade within the United States. However,


My Take On Climate Change

I haven’t noticed any changes in our climate, maybe because we live in the city and I don’t really travel much. I have noticed that it hardly snows anymore or when it does it’s late in the winter season. We don’t get the snow-white Christmas like we used