Just Released! Order “Waking Up to Climate Change” by George Ropes, and receive 25% Discount. Learn More

Close this search box.
Close this search box.

HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

Powering America on Solar by City Tech Blogger Mohammad Raihan

How much of America would we need to supply with solar panels in order to achieve 100% renewable energy status? Not much. In order to provide enough energy for the United States. We would have to produce four million gigawatts of energy per hour. That’s a lot of energy, but if 2.8 acres of land produce 1 gigawatt of energy per hour we would have to use… 11,200,000 acres of land! However, the US all together is about 1.9 billion acres. That’s roughly around .6 percent of the whole of the United States. Easy, doesn’t seem so bad, all America has to do is just set aside .6 percent of land and put solar panels all over the land, and to show how much land would be required. Here’s a map of the US and the amount of land needed to cover.


But things aren’t so simple as putting solar panels in an area and that’s that. We would have to worry about cloudy days, how are we going to store that much energy the solar panels would provide. Also, consider all the roads, power lines, and facilities we would need to create because of this, and that would expand the area needed greatly. Also, the wildlife would be affected in that area as well. All of this would cost money, A LOT of money. But, this would also create jobs, improve the economy, and we would set an example for other countries to follow our lead as well. Besides we wouldn’t even need to make all the renewable energy from solar. Wind and hydropower are viable options as well. Additionally, investing in research for solar panels that produce more, and batteries that store more energy are ways of reducing the amount of land needed. Furthermore, spreading the amount of land to different areas would be more beneficial as well. Creating solar farms around major cities would help cities’ economies grow and reduce wildlife disruption. The first step to actually achieving 100% renewable energy status is realizing just how much it would actually take.

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

3 Responses

  1. I agree that America should use 100% renewable energy. Yes, it will definitely be hard to achieve that and there will be many disadvantages and advantages to it. But here, I think the disadvantages overtake the advantages. I see on the image you provided it shows that very little land is needed to accomplished this but as mentioned in your post, alot of little things have to be weighed in order to place these solar panels on that land. I think a better way for America to set an example to other countries is by making it mandatory for each household to have solar panels. Once every household, business, school, church, etc. in America has solar panels then that will certainly help our environment. Hopefully after a few years, we can come out with stats and proof that using solar panels does in fact help the environment and that will allow other countries to follow in our footsteps.

    1. Thanks for your comment on 100% renewable energy, Dominick. Perhaps you might follow this subject and find out how expensive solar panels are and if there are any governmental programs to help home owners install the panels. I do believe New York State has such programs, are they in any other state?

  2. I really like your idea and you are absolutely right that it takes a lot of money but it also creates jobs as well. Solar energy is the cleanest energy we have so far but it is expensive too. If some how in the future we are able to generate energy using solar panels on a large scale, we have to store that energy using some sort of batteries in order to use it when its dark. But for crating batteries that hold huge amounts of charge in it will be composed of different chemicals and these chemicals will probably have a long life-span. After time, these chemicals need to be replaced in order to keep the batteries fully functional. So when we dispose these chemicals, we need to take into the consideration that these chemical include acid, lead, nickle, lithium, alkaline, mercury, and metal hydride which have a highly negative impact on the environment.These chemicals are extremely toxic and cause damage to the environment, polluting the soil and water and endangering the wildlife. In time, it will affect people’s health as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.


More Posts Like This


Climate Change in the New York City Metro Area

There is no doubt that the New York City metro area became one of the richest and most famous cities on Earth due to its access to the Hudson River and Atlantic Ocean. The New York Harbor is one of the most perfect natural harbors on Earth for


Cultivating Resilience: Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change

Climate change poses significant threats to global agriculture, impacting the very backbone of human sustenance. Altering precipitation patterns, increasing temperatures, and extreme weather events are disrupting traditional farming cycles and threatening food security worldwide. The agricultural sector is responding to these challenges with innovative adaptive strategies aimed at


Global Pandemics & Global Climate Change

Do global pandemics and global climate change affect each other? How? In my point of view, I can say it is affirmative that global pandemics and climate change can affect each other in many ways. Here is how they both affect each other. The degradation of the environment