Just Released! Order “Waking Up to Climate Change” by George Ropes, and receive 25% Discount. Learn More

Close this search box.
Close this search box.

HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

Climate Change Adaptation and New Jersey’s Widening Coastline by Barnard Blogger Samantha Goldberg

In 2012, Superstorm Sandy wrought destruction upon my hometown of Port Monmouth, New Jersey, along with many other communities on the New York-New Jersey coastline. With a storm surge of nearly 9 feet, my neighborhood was entirely inundated — to the effect that my neighbors down the street had to be rescued by boat after they failed to evacuate. In the wake of the storm, some $50 billion worth of damage was incurred: homes were unhinged from their foundations; the surviving ones remained powerless for weeks; and the familiar streets of New Jersey’s beach towns were buried under mountains of sand. Sandy’s near perpendicular landfall in New Jersey represents a rare weather event, with an estimated return period of 714 years. Given such infrequency, many news outlets were quick to link her origins to anthropogenically- induced climate change. Indeed, global warming is projected to increase the intensity (and reduce the frequency) of hurricanes, but given limitations in attribution science, climate scientists still cannot definitively ascribe Sandy to climate change. Nevertheless, New Jersey has begun to alter its topography in anticipation of new flood risks posed to the coast by climate change.

When I returned home from college my freshman year in 2015, I was surprised to find a beach that was wider than the one I had left. Termed “beach replenishment,” this was one of the flood mitigation projects undertaken by the Army Corps of Engineers (on the agenda for over a decade but stalled by lack of funds) to restore the sand lost to storm erosion and protect the New Jersey coastline from future storm surge and sea level rise, increasingly expected with climate change. This year, four more towns in Ocean County, New Jersey, began a similar project. Adding 11 million cubic yards to 14 miles of beaches, these beach replenishment efforts constitute one of the largest replenishment projects in history and have received abundant pushback from homeowners, who are challenging the Army Corps’ invocation of eminent domain over the coastline. In light of such undertakings, a debate has emerged surrounding the efficacy of beach replenishment as a climate change adaptation strategy. Though these projects, which consist of moving sand usually from offshore onto the coastline, protect against coastal property damage and can shelter shoreline habitats from salt water intrusion, some have questioned the ability of beach replenishment to provide long-term solutions to the coastal issues that climate change will exacerbate, particularly because beach replenishment does not inhibit future erosion and thus requires constant maintenance.

Moreover, the environmental impacts extend beyond the beach itself. When sediments are displaced from nearshore areas, the dredge pits have been shown to alter wave patterns and turbidity, which can ultimately expedite coastal erosion. As a result of this sediment transfer, marine ecosystems are inevitably disrupted, with varying abilities to recover. One particularly damaging period occurs during the transport of dredged sediment, when significant portions of the material may leak into unintended areas. When Rockaway Beach was undergoing beach replenishment in the 1970s, for example, it was estimated that 10% of excavated sediment never made it to the desired location. When such sediment is accidentally deposited in marine communities, it can cloud the water, inhibiting light penetration and vegetation growth, or cover sea grasses and coral reefs, putting undue weight them.

Many of the environmental concerns embodied in beach replenishment can be reduced by careful impact assessments and planning, but given the costs of these projects now and into the future, carefully considering alternatives is definitely warranted. They become all the more enticing when one remembers New Jersey’s failed beach replenishment projects, such as the $2.5 million Ocean City project in 1982 that was completely blown away a mere two months after completion. These alternatives may take the form of building hard structures, such as seawalls or revetments (which, albeit, could be even more expensive), but it may also be worth asking whether such extreme measures should be taken to delay inevitable coastal losses to erosion and sea level rise at all.

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

3 Responses

  1. My hometown was too impacted by Hurricane Sandy. Like Port Monmouth, New Jersey Oceanside, New York suffered severe financial and environmental damage. However, the concept of “beach replenishment” is not applicable to Oceanside, New York. Local beaches such as those in Long Beach “shrunk” after Hurricane Sandy. This demonstrates the need to tailor disaster-preparedness to each locale based on their unique environmental conditions.

  2. Ocerall, I found this to be a very informative read. Being from California (where the main issue in the past years has been drought, as opposed to flooding), it was interesting to learn how people have been working to deal with the opposite issue as the one I am familiar with. Additionally, I agree that it is important to consider the external costs of these solutions so that we are careful not to introduce new problems to the system, such as the issue with sediments weighing down sea life that you mention.

  3. Hearing of the assessments needed regarding the practice of beach replenishment highlights the complexities involved in addressing climate change. Although this is an example of an attempt in mitigating erosion and the effects of intense storms, it also shows that iterative learning is needed to maximize efforts. Unfortunately, we may not have the time and resources to do this as climate change marches forward.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.


More Posts Like This


Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): A Crucial Technology for Mitigating Climate Change

Climate change is one of the most pressing challenges of our time, requiring urgent action to mitigate its impacts. Among the array of solutions, carbon capture and storage (CCS) stands out as a crucial technology for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change. This essay explores the


Climate Change and the Industries of the World

It’s no surprise that when the climate of an area changes, it impacts most, if not all of their industries and way of life of countries. Some of these industries include tourism, agriculture, fishery, and infrastructure, which all dictate the economy and life quality of the residents in


Solar Power: One of the Most Impactful Renewable Energies To Combat Climate Change

Several innovative technologies, such as solar power, wind power, green hydrogen power, electric vehicles, etc., have the potential to significantly impact mitigating climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, increasing energy efficiency, and promoting sustainable practices. In this essay, I am going to talk about solar power and