HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

What about that 3%? by CityTech Blogger Jonathan Yee

By now, just about everyone knows the often-cited statistic: 97% of papers agree that anthropogenic climate change (ACC, referred to as AGW in the article) is real. The remainder consists of dissenting papers that reject ACC– a total of 38 papers. As it turns out, those papers had not undergone peer review prior to being published and cited. In November 2016, a research paper was published in Theoretical and Applied Climatology Journal that reviewed these 38 contrarian papers. All of these papers contained major flaws, such as starting with false assumptions, neglecting context, cherry-picking data, misrepresentation of statistics, and even erroneous analysis.


For example, some of these papers claimed that the sun’s effect on global climate was such that greenhouse gases would have no effect, even though common sense tells us that both solar energy and greenhouse gases are mutually dependent factors in climatology. All the greenhouse gases in the universe would do nothing without an energy source, and celestial bodies cannot maintain their surface temperature without an insulating medium above the planet’s surface.

Cherry-picking data is said to be one of the cardinal sins of research, yet this was exactly what a number of these 38 papers did, using only favorable results and simply throwing out the unfavorable ones. Just as egregious is simply ignoring the greater context of the results or other data involved in generating the models, yet some of these papers are guilty of that, too.

Some papers “presented implausible or incomplete physics,” according to this article. The entire basis of climatology is based in physics, yet there are papers being cited that contain implausible physics. None of the results in these 38 papers could be replicated, meaning that the models used were tuned to provide a particular result. Katharine Hayhoe, the article’s lead author, commented, “Every single one of those analyses had an error — in their assumptions, methodology, or analysis — that, when corrected, brought their results into line with the scientific consensus.”

So what does this mean? Anthropogenic climate change is no longer a scientific consensus. It is a scientific unanimity. Now, science isn’t absolutely perfect or correct all the time. Indeed, science never stops evolving. However, climate change is one issue that humanity cannot simply leave for tomorrow. Even if all the scientists in the world are wrong about climate change, the potential consequences of ignoring their warnings so vastly outweigh the potential benefits that it is not worth the risk. We have nowhere else to go. We cannot simply pack our bags and go to the planet next door. Even if the scientific unanimity is wrong, we can only benefit from the large scale sustainability research and development.

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


More Posts Like This


How We Help to Slow, Stop or Solve Climate Change by a City Tech Blogger

If everyone could stop in a minute to acknowledge the harms we are causing on our planet, what would earth look like in the next 10 years or is it too late?  To quote George Bernard Shaw: “Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their


My take on Climate Change By A City Tech Blogger

  In the recent decade, I personally observed that temperatures started to get warmer and the winter season isn’t as cold as it once was. There have usual changes in temperature such as temperatures normally near zero degrees in the wintertime being in the twenties and thirties. In


Climate Change Effects in NYC by City Tech Blogger Orel Jeffrey

New York City is one of the most resourceful cities in the United States. Since the 1970s, the effects of climate change have become more apparent.  Warmer temperatures, rising sea levels and more snow and rain are a few of the effects experienced. While a number of investments

Take action in the fight against climate change