HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

OUR TAKE: Playing Both Sides of the Fossil Fuel Fence

A new report of how G20 Governments are pouring more funds into fossil fuels has just appeared on the Oil Change International site.  Oil Change International is a research, communication, and advocacy organization that exposes the true costs of fossil fuels and seeks to facilitate future transitions towards clean energy.

Science has overwhelmingly shown that preventing global warming means keeping temperatures well below 2°C to ultimately limit warming to 1.5°C by curtailing the use of fossil fuels. This goal was a major part of the Paris Agreement on climate change that was signed in April, 2016 by 195 countries.

Alarmingly, many governments who signed the agreement continue to fund fossil fuel projects.  The report, “Talk is Cheap: How G20 Governments are Financing Climate Disaster,” shows how many of the G20 nations still fund the fossil fuel industry and are among the world’s largest economies (and polluters), who, in Paris, had committed to curtail support for fossil fuels in favor of low-carbon alternatives. The report shows that the shift from fossil fuel funding to low-carbon alternatives has yet to happen.

billions on fossil fuels

https://www.ecowatch.com/g20-finance-fossil-fuels-2453712123.html

Here are some alarming figures:

The US financed fossil fuels to the tune of $6 billion annually 2013-2015, versus $1.3B for renewables. Japan’s split was $16.5B – $2.7B; China’s, surprisingly, was $13.5B – 85M. Japan was 3rd largest funder at about $9B, US 4th at $6B – $1.3B. Other G20 nations poured $17.5B into US fossil fuel companies. As one of the authors of the report said, “We must stop funding fossils and shift these subsidies.” Hear, hear! ClimateYou awaits the 2016 post-Paris numbers with great interest.

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on email

More Posts Like This

CLIMATEYOU

Update: Investor Summits on Climate Risk: Advancing the Clean Trillion

Key players in the financial world came together in 2016 to learn how to invest trillions of dollars in the fight against global warming. The “2016 Investor Summit on Climate Risk: Advancing the Clean Trillion” was billed as the first major event on climate change for investors and

CONSEQUENCES

OUR TAKE: Heat Projections Higher in Recent Climate Models

Global climate models have been used by climate scientists since the 1970s. They have been refined over the years as more data have accumulated and computers have become faster and more powerful. Yet, even the relatively simple models from the 1970s have proved to be quite accurate at

OUR TAKE

OUR TAKE: Joe Manchin & Ecocide

Damn Joe Manchin. We’re toast, burnt toast, as a nation and a species. Manchin is guilty of killing American democracy — a woefully inadequate social welfare Reconciliation bill guarantees Trump 2024,  ecocide — a token American response to the climate crisis guarantees the failure of the UN climate

Take action in the fight against climate change