HOME          CATEGORIES          OUR TAKE

Experts in U.S. and China see a chance for cooperation against climate change

The New York Times in an article by Edward Wong and Andrew Revkin summarized two recent reports that propose ways for President Obama and Chinese leaders begin addressing how to work together to curb emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.  Both nations now recognize the urgency of global warming and the need for agreements between them if a new international climate treaty is to be possible. 
 
“A Roadmap for U.S.-China Cooperation on Energy and Climate Change,” is by Steven Chu, now the secretary of energy, John Thornton, who may become the U.S. ambassador to China, and John Holdren, Obama’s choice for science adviser.  The report recommends that China and the U.S. convene a presidential summit meeting to create a broad plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; then senior officials and independent experts would be named to councils and task forces to develop concrete programs. 
 
The second report, by David Sandalow and Kenneth Lieberthal, both fellows of the Brookings Institution, lists nine ways to build political support in both countries for long term cooperation on cutting emissions. 
 
Officials from both countries say that the process outlined in “Roadmap” could establish a new framework for U.S.-China relations.  However, both countries may be too focused on reviving their economies to devote much attention to curbing emissions.  Any partnership forged through the “Roadmap” process must be sustained, not episodic.  Old attitudes and entrenched positions remain, but are starting to give way to new realities.  As Wu Jianmin, a senior adviser to the Foreign Ministry said, “We all understand we don’t have much time left.  We’ve got to work together.”

Comment on this article

ClimateYou moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on email

More Posts Like This

CONSEQUENCES

Our Take: How serious is Biden about climate?

Since ascending to the Presidency with bold and ambitious plans for tackling the climate crisis, Joe Biden has compiled a lengthy and damning list of disappointing decisions accommodating or favoring the fossil fuel industry. These indicate that while Biden “gets” climate, he’s still a politician at heart. He

CONSEQUENCES

Our Take: We Need a World Climate Authority

This ClimateYou post is written in reaction to the informative article in Smithsonian Magazine posted on August 4, 2021 titled: “Just 5 Percent of Power Plants Release 73 Percent of Global Electricity Production Emissions”.  The study upon which the article is based examined the emissions generated by all

OUR TAKE

How goes the Crusade to Tame the Feral Climate? Part 2: In Glascow

Part 2: In Glasgow The US played a leadership role at the Paris conference, and was pivotal in encouraging, cajoling, persuading, convincing the 195 national delegations or Parties as they are called, to reach an accord. Of course, the US didn’t do it all by itself, but without

Take action in the fight against climate change